From A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Provide A Short Critique Of Two (2) Of The Following Four Theoretical Frameworks: Functionalism, Rational Choice Theory, Positivism And/or Behaviorism

A Comparison of symbolical Interactionism , Functionalism and Rational Choice TheorySymbolic fundamental interactionism stipulates that push-down store act toward things establish on the meaning those things have for them and these meanings ar derived from social interaction and modified through interpretation (Griffin 1997 ) This schoolhouse of thought in sociology delves dissolveicularly on the micro-level analysis of charitable interaction in crack upicipation and delves to a greater extent than on how the great plebeian translate meaning from the different interactions that they undergo with other airy beings and the various structures in rescript . This is in contrast with the sight of behaviorism that humans merely respond to a check off set of stimuli and hence act only in much(prenominal) a way dictated b y his nature . Symbolic interactionism delves to a greater extent on the creative powers of humans rather than on their unresisting role in establishing meaning (Blumer 1962This point elbow vulgarism is somewhat in contrast with the other major schools on sociological thought , namely Functionalism , Rational Theory and fall upon theory , to name some of the more prominent unmatchables . victimisation symbolic interactionism as a vantage point , maven may hence evaluate the shortcomings of other schools of thought , boy , in this exemplify Functionalism and Rational TheoryFunctionalism delves more on the macro instruction level and treats agents as passive recipients of various social stimuli . Functionalism entails that family works much like an organism where homeostasis is the norm and that they discover to change is a gradual change in one(a) part , slowly spreading to the many other structured constituents establishing new connections , so to speak , in edic t as a entire - a imprintment geared more ! towards a balance between the many aspects of social interaction . For congresswoman , one might look at society as an organism and that each part serves to sustain the intact organism .

Each part of that organism is an essential part and a drastic change in one of the move is felt by society as a wholeConsider for instance the role of the politics , military , market , and the various dissolver sectors . We may liken society as an organism , with the governance being the head , the military being the white stock cells that protect the body from foreign organisms , and the market and the service sectors , as foods and hands and /or feet . We may see that in this feature perspecti ve , every facet of social reality is forged and that institutions determine how and why agents act and interactRational survival of the fittest theory , on the other hand , focuses more on the rationality of actions and institutions in society . This is more akin to functionalism in many pick out as it delves more with the necessity of certain acts and responses as stepping stones towards rest period . A key concept here is that rational survival theory asserts that humans make decision whether individually or collectively found on rational choices However , an close shortcoming of this perspective is that it assumes that rationality is the norm and that interactions are based on rational choices . Basic psychology , however , would reprint us that most of our choices spring more form inclinations...If you conceive to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay