More striking than the division between relatively privileged whites and less(prenominal)-privileged minorities (and less expected to me) was the way in which the genders were represented. We hold in all heard discussions about the feminization of poverty, but I had never really thought about how completely this was genuine until I visited the eudaemonia office. Almost all of the clients were women. Of course, this in and of itself does not mean that most people who are poorer are women: Women whitethorn be and probably are more inclined to try out public assistant than are men because they feel less of a stigma in doing so.
They may well in addition be more likely to seek publi
Even more surprising to me than the fact that so many of the clients were female was the fact that nearly every worker was female. I asked one of the security guards about this (he was one of solo two male workers I saw) and his explanation was that the duty didn't give very well and didn't have very much prestige, which is wherefore women tended to be over-represented in its ranks. He said something that explained a spectacular deal of what I saw: "The same kinds of things that push women onto welfare are the same kinds of things that make women take whatever job they can get - which means that the only real difference here between the workers and those on welfare is just a very little bit of luck.
Schaefer, R. Sociology (8th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
c assistance because they have children to care for and so believe that they have fewer choices than do men.
Haviland, William. Cultural Anthropology (10th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth, 2001.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment